Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schoblom v. Anacortes Veneer, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1953No. 31992Published

1Opinion of the Court

42 Wn.2d 338 (1953)

255 P.2d 379

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Hugo Schoblom, Appellant,

v.

ANACORTES VENEER, INC., Respondent.[1]

No. 31992.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 27, 1953.

Wright & Wright, for appellant.

John N. Cheney and Welts & Welts, for respondent.

WEAVER, J.

This action is based upon the application of relator (appellant) for a writ of mandate to require respondent corporation (1) to employ appellant in its plywood mill; and (2) to deliver to him the salary he would have received (less his earnings elsewhere) had he been employed at the time he requested…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. BardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kitsap County Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Simpson v. HutchingsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Tacoma v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. Schoblom v. Anacortes Veneer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API