Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Hutchings

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1952No. 32053PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This action was commenced by appellant Simpson to recover from respondent Hutchings $22,287 alleged to be due pursuant to a contract whereby respondent Hutchings was purchasing from appellant Simpson one half of the capital stock of the J. R. Simpson Motor Company, Inc.

Respondent Hutchings admitted the contract but' alleged that appellant Simpson had subsequently orally agreed with him to sell the remaining one half of the capital stock of the aforementioned company to the Simpson-Hutchings Motor Company, the latter transaction to include the assignment, transfer or cancellation of the debt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BoundyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kitsap County Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. J. A. Wiley Co. v. RiggleWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Goodman v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Browning v. BrowningWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Weiss v. WeissWashington Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API