Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Schoblom v. Anacortes Veneer, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1953No. 31992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This action is based upon the application of relator (appellant) for a writ of mandate to require respondent corporation (1) to employ appellant in its plywood mill; and (2) to deliver to him the salary he would have received (less his earnings elsewhere) had he been employed at the time he requested employment.

Two questions are presented. First, is the contract one which a court will enforce by writ of mandate or decree of specific performance? Second, is the appellant entitled to the wages he would have received (less his earnings elsewhere) had he been employed by respondent?

Respondent was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. BardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kitsap County Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Simpson v. HutchingsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Tacoma v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State ex rel. Krutz v. Washington Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. McIntyre v. Fort Vancouver Plywood Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. Earl v. GeftaxWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Edwards v. TremperWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Sherman v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API