Legal Opinion
State v. Herbst
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 3, 1963No. File No. MV 10-9306PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKinmonth, J.
The defendant was charged with evading responsibility in violation of § 14-224 of the General Statutes. He was found guilty and has appealed. His first assignment of error is based on the claim that he was not guilty of the offense charged since the court did not find that he had knowingly caused damage to property. This assignment is not well taken and need not be considered, since he did not comply with Circuit Court Rules 7.13.1 and 7.21.1. There was no finding, nor was it required. He also assigns error in the conclusion of the trial court that on all of the evidence the defendant was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. AnnunziatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Sharkiewicz v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Goggins v. FawcettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- State v. LariviereConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- State v. BensonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968
- State v. RichterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.