Legal Opinion

Goggins v. Fawcett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 2, 1958PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

In this opinion the named defendant will be treated as though he was the sole defendant and he will be referred to as the defendant. The action against the defendant Avis Ford, Inc., was withdrawn. Agency of the named defendant for his father, the defendant owner of the motor vehicle, has not been contested. The complaint alleged the following : The plaintiff was operating his automobile in a southerly direction on route 8 in the town of Colebrook about 7:45 p.m. on April 24, 1955, when the defendant drove his vehicle from off the highway into the plaintiff’s car. The defendant drove…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Craft Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. Quinnipiac Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. State v. CianfloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. McWilliams v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. Ripley v. RodgersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Hutchinson v. PlanteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. State v. MackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. BooneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Way v. PaventSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API