Legal Opinion

Indian Head Mills of Alabama v. Ashworth

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 16, 1926No. 6 Div. 472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

This is an action under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Acts 1919, p. 206), for compensation for an alleged injury growing out of plaintiff’s employment, I viz. for a hernia or rupture.

After a review of the evidence, the judgment entry recites:

“From a consideration of all the evidence, the court is impressed that plaintiff did suffer some injury at the time he claims. But the plaintiff has failed to reasonably satisfy the court that there resulted such disability as entitles him to compensation. Recognizing the possibility of error in this finding, and in order that no injustice may be done…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hurt v. HurtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Ex parte OvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alabama Marble Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Barrett v. Consolidated Coal Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1946
  3. Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. Carr v. Adventure Motors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API