Ex Parte Alabama Marble Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
When, without fraud, a canse has been submitted on the evidence for the final judgment of the court, the trial being completed, it is the duty of the court to proceed to render an appropriate judgment according to the merits of the case. Indian Head Mills v. Ashworth, 215 Ala. 348, 110 So. 565.
' This we think is a mandatory duty, which cannot be qualified by any theory of judicial discretion. To say that the trial court may at its discretion set aside a submission, repudiate a trial already completed, and reopen the case for another trial, would be to reduce judicial procedure to utter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peoples Bank v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Walker v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- In re WattsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Livergood v. RhoadesIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Melbourne State Bank v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Weintraub v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Biggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Town Council of Guntersville v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.