Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2004No. S097600PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

During jury selection, each party is entitled to a limited number of peremptory challenges. (Code Civ. Proc., § 231.) However, exercising peremptory challenges to remove prospective jurors solely because of group bias, for example, on racial grounds, violates both the California Constitution (People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258 [148 Cal.Rptr. 890, 583 P.2d *1306748] (Wheeler)) and the United States Constitution (Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79 [106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69] (Batson)). Both Wheeler and, later, Batson established procedures for courts to follow when one…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. YeomanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API