People v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
During jury selection, each party is entitled to a limited number of peremptory challenges. (Code Civ. Proc., § 231.) However, exercising peremptory challenges to remove prospective jurors solely because of group bias, for example, on racial grounds, violates both the California Constitution (People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258 [148 Cal.Rptr. 890, 583 P.2d *1306748] (Wheeler)) and the United States Constitution (Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79 [106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69] (Batson)). Both Wheeler and, later, Batson established procedures for courts to follow when one…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. YeomanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.