Legal Opinion

Adams v. Barry

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1978No. B-6888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEAKLEY, Justice.

The question here is whether proffered testimony in support of the probate of an alleged lost will was properly excluded by the trial court pursuant to Article 3716, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat., commonly called the Dead Man’s Statute.

George H. Adams died in 1973 and a will executed by him on July 31, 1968 was admitted to probate. A brother, Julius 0. Adams, was the named beneficiary; and an attorney, Robert F. Salter, was named independent executor. Sometime later, this suit was filed by Miss Victoria V. Barry, Respondent, to set aside the earlier probate of the 1968 will, and to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holland v. NimitzTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. International Traveler's Ass'n v. BettisTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Ragsdale v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Roberts v. WimberlyTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Martin v. McAdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mortenson v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Estate of Watson, in ReTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Billie J. Pasley v. Dennis Pasley and Barbara Pasley Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  4. Billie J. Pasley v. Dennis Pasley and Barbara Pasley Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  5. Billie J. Pasley v. Dennis Pasley and Barbara Pasley Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API