Legal Opinion

Estate of Watson, in Re

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1986No. C-5228PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Justice.

This case involves interpretation of the scope of TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 3716 (Vernon 1926) (now amended in Rule 601(b), TEX.R.EVIDENCE), “the Dead Man’s Statute,” with respect to letters written by the decedent to the proponent of a will in a will contest case.

Edna S. Watson died testate, and her will was admitted to probate. The will named her sister, Irma S. Rozelle, as independent executrix as well as primary beneficiary to the substantial exclusion of other heirs. Thus, respondents A. Merrill Smith and the other heirs at law brought this contest alleging (1) lack…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. McAdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Adams v. BarryTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Jones v. SelmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Sparkman v. Estate of MasseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Stewart v. ShoemakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sims v. Brackett, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  2. Green v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Godsey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  4. Ardelia Austin and Allayne Austin// Betty Simmons Austin v. Betty Simmons Austin// Ardelia Austin and Allayne Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
  5. Gale Godsey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API