Legal Opinion

Martin v. McAdams

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1894No. 181PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fifth District, in an appeal from Hill County.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

This was a proceeding to probate a will. By the judgment of the County Court the will was admitted to probate; but upon appeal to the District Court there was a verdict declaring it a forgery, and a judgment accordingly. The latter judgment was affirmed in the Court of Civil Appeals.

Upon the trial each of the two persons whose names appeared to the alleged will as subscribing witnesses, testified, that the signature which purported to be his resembled his signature, but that he had no recollection of ever having subscribed to the paper as a witness. One testified,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Roberts v. WimberlyTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Flood v. PragoffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
  4. Lewis v. Heirs of AylottTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Phillips' ex'r v. Phillips' adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. International Traveler's Ass'n v. BettisTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ragsdale v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Leahy v. TimonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Simon v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Hutto v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1942

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API