People v. McGarry
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBIE, J.
This case addresses the issue of how to allocate the monetary credit resulting from excess presentence custody credit to a base fine, penalty assessments and a restitution fine. We conclude that the monetary credit must be applied “on a proportional basis” (Pen. Code, § 2900.5, subd. (a) (hereafter section 2900.5(a)). 1 In other words, each dollar of monetary credit must be used proportionally to reduce the base fine, penalty assessments and restitution fine rather than any one of these categories alone. Thus, if the monetary credit does not eliminate all amounts due, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Hensley v. Peace Officers Training FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. CarranzaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
- P v. Livingston CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- P. v. Mosbrucker CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.