Legal Opinion

Kick v. Doerste

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from, the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge. ?

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

— The matters in controversy on this appeal are between the plaintiff, who is a mechanic, and the appellant Dreste, who is the owner of a building in the city of St.. Louis. The defendant Doerste made a contract with Dreste to construct for him a brick dwelling-house to be erected on a lot belonging to Dreste. The plaintiff, as a subcontractor under Doerste, furnished the materials for, and did the brick work on, the building. Doerste failed to pay him, and in this action he sought a judgment against Doerste, and the enforcement of a mechanic’s lien against the building and the lot upon which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morrison v. YanceyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Jodd v. DuncanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Flynt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Wilburn v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Matney v. Gregg Bros. Grain Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fry v. EstesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Red-E-Gas Company v. MeadowsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Johnson v. Estate of GirvinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Flanagan Bros. v. O'ConnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Putthoff v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API