Legal Opinion

Fry v. Estes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1892PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Pike Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The action is one to recover damages caused to the testator of the plaintiffs by the wrongful prosecution of a writ of attachment. The petition contains two counts. The first alleges a wrongful prosecution of the writ, the attachment of the decedent’s property thereon, the final dissolution of the *3attachment, and damages, direct and consequential, arising to the decedent from the attachment in the amount of $2,500. The second count contains a reference to the first, and states that the attachment was sued out maliciously and without any probable cause, and seeks a recovery of damages to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scovill v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Kirksey v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  3. State ex rel. Roe v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  4. McLaughlin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. State ex rel. Hayden v. McHaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. KnoxNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lee National Corporation v. DeramusDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  3. Talbott v. Great Western Plaster Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Simmons v. MurrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Foley v. Union House Furnishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API