Legal Opinion

Snohomish County v. Boettcher

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1965No. 37548PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal, relating to attorney fees and costs in eminent domain proceedings comes here on an agreed statement of facts. Appellants owned real property abutting the existing county gravel pit in Snohomish County near Arlington. Snohomish County, hoping to enlarge the county’s gravel pit, negotiated with appellants to purchase 10 acres of this tract. In January, 1962, one of the county commissioners, acting informally and prior to any official action, offered appellants $20,000 for the property, which offer the appellants accepted. The board of county commissioners, considering the offer in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Holly-Mason Hardware Co. v. SchnatterlyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Vollman v. Industrial Workers of the WorldWashington Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harold Meyer Drug v. HurdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  2. Brown v. Suburban Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.S.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Judges of Everett District Court v. HurdWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Blue Mountain Service Corp. v. ZlateffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API