Legal Opinion

In re the Retention Pursuant to CPL 330.20 of Michael RR.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas D. Nolan, Jr., J.

The motion of the State Commissioner of Mental Health (hereinafter Commissioner) to set aside a jury verdict after a rehearing held pursuant to CPL 330.20 is denied without costs.

*743Following this rehearing, the jury rendered a verdict finding unanimously that Michael RR. suffered from a mental illness, but finding unanimously that he does not pose a real threat of substantial physical harm to himself or others. The jury never reached the question whether Mr. RR.’s judgment is so impaired that he is unable to understand the need for continued care and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Brewster v. Prince Apartments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Jaquay v. AveryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Santalucia v. County of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D'Ulisse v. Amchen Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API