Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Traveler Shoe Co. v. Koch

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.

This is a bill in equity brought to compel the defendants to lease to the plaintiff a portion of the premises numbered 2215 on Washington Street in the city of Boston. The final decree ordered the defendants Goldsmith, Berliner and Rosengard to execute and deliver a lease as prayed for; and the case is before us on their appeal from the decree.

The judge of the Superior Court,* who saw and heard the witnesses, made certain findings of fact; and under the familiar rule these will not be reversed or modified unless they are plainly wrong. Adams v. Protective Union Co. 210 Mass. 172. Counsel have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. CartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Griffin v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Caswell v. FellowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Stowell v. GramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Trudeau v. PoutreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Codman v. BeaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. International Paper Co. v. Priscilla Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Curran v. MageeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. New England Cabinet Works v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Goldsmith v. Traveler Shoe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API