Legal Opinion

Stowell v. Gram

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 6, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Contract, for alleged breach of a contract in writing between one Holt doing business under the name of the Holt. Novelty Company and the plaintiffs, to make and deliver five hundred field of view dividers, a divider being an appliance to be placed on a camera, against Theodore 0. Gram and Henry Pletsch, assignees of the contract, alleged to have assumed its obligations.

Read the full summary

Contract, for alleged breach of a contract in writing between one Holt doing business under the name of the Holt. Novelty Company and the plaintiffs, to make and deliver five hundred field of view dividers, a divider being an appliance to be placed on a camera, against Theodore 0. Gram and Henry Pletsch, assignees of the contract, alleged to have assumed its obligations. Writ dated September 11, 1896. At the trial in the Superior Court before Gaslcill, J., the judge ordered a Verdict for the defendants, and, by agreement of the parties, reported the case for determination by this court. If…

1Opinion of the Court

Kkowltoe", C. J.

In the present case the presiding judge directed a verdict for the defendants, and reported to this court the question of law whether there was any evidence that would warrant a verdict for the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs made a contract for the manufacture of certain articles with one Holt, who became financially embarrassed after he had begun the work, and then arranged with these defendants that they should take a bill of sale of certain property and an assignment of this contract, and assist him in his embarrassment. The question is whether there was evidence which would…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Wakefield v. American Surety Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Tudor Press, Inc. v. University Distributing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. New England Cabinet Works v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Truscon Steel Co. v. Thirlwell Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Chatham Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Angier Chemical Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API