Legal Opinion
Otero v. 971 Only U, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 9, 2007PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered February 2, 2006, which, to the extent appealable, denied plaintiffs’ motion to renew a prior ruling dated Septem*431ber 21, 2005, granting a motion by defendants 971 Only U and Drame for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and restored to active status the claims against defendants Rodriguez and Garcia, unanimously modified, on the law, that portion of the order restoring the claims against Rodriguez and Garcia to active status vacated, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs failed to set forth any new facts not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mullings v. HuntworkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Vasquez v. ReluzcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Smith v. BritoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dembele v. CambisacaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rodriguez v. AbdallahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Danvers v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Rivera v. Gelco Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Mickens v. KhalidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.