Legal Opinion

Danvers v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case of serious injury under either a quantitative or qualitative analysis (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345, 350-351 [2002]). Concerning her lumbar spine, while plaintiff submitted evidence of herniated and bulging discs and a history of pain, an objective assessment of her range-of-motion limitations was not made until more than five years after the accident, too remote to permit an inference that her limitations were caused by the accident (see Medina v Medina, 49 AD3d 335 [2008]). Concerning her ankle, the arthroscopic surgery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Otero v. 971 Only U, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. O'Bradovich v. MrijajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Medina v. MedinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pou v. E&S Wholesale Meats, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Jean v. KabayaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Alicea v. Troy Trans, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Natera v. Veloz Livery Rentals Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API