Legal Opinion

United States v. Hinton

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 23, 1976No. SPCM 11876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was found guilty by a BCD special court-martial of one charge of assault and one of aggravated assault, both under Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 928. The approved sentence is set out above.

Appellant’s principal assertion before us is that he was denied military due process of law by the intrusion of unlawful com*565mand influence into the pretrial proceedings. Our disposition of that issue moots appellant’s other assignments of error. We find that there was error in the pretrial proceedings, but that it was…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HawthorneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. GarciaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. ConwayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. HannaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HamiltonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. DraytonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API