Legal Opinion

United States v. Drayton

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 28, 1994No. ACMR 9201149PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND

LANE, Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial of larceny from the post exchange (PX), in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for six months, and reduction to Private El.

This case initially came before this court for review on 27 August 1992. Pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A.1982), the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. In Re YamashitaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. CruzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. TreakleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DraytonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. DraytonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API