Legal Opinion
Danko v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 10, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1235PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rufe, District Judge.
In this case brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),1 Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) has filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint, which Plaintiffs oppose. For the following reasons, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, filed this action on their own behalf and on behalf of a proposed class of similarly-situated individuals. The Complaint alleges that Mark Danko, an Amtrak employee, and his wife Pauline receive health insurance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Blunt v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- In Re Schering Plough Corp. Intron/Temodar Consumer Class ActionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CORBITT v. TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- D'ANDREA v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Young v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022