Legal Opinion

City of Tacoma v. Krech

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1896No. 2242PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Emmett N. Parker, Judge.

1Per curiam

The appellant was convicted in the municipal court for violating a city ordinance of the *297city of Tacoma, which ordinance prevents barbers from pursuing their calling, from shaving or doing any work in connection with their trade, for compensation, on Sunday. Appeal was taken to the superior court of Pierce county. On the trial appellant was again convicted, and from the judgment of that court this appeal is taken.

This judgment is attacked for various reasons by the appellant, but with the view we take of his last contention, viz., that the law is special and is obnoxious to the provisions of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Eden v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Keim v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Dennis v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. County of Spokane v. Valu-Mart, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Ex parte NorthrupOregon Supreme Court · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API