Legal Opinion
Mdewakanton Sioux Indians of Minnesota v. Jewell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 9, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-2323PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion fob Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs aré currently engaged in litigation to compel various federal entities to recognize them as an American Indian tribe. Plaintiffs now seek a temporary restraining order, followed by a preliminary injunction, barring an election to amend the constitution of a different tribe, because Plaintiffs assert the amendments would impair their rights. Because Plajn-tiffs fail to demonstrate an irreparable injury, neither a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Navajo Nation v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Alcresta Therapeutics, Inc. v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Harris v. Medical Transportation Management, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Navajo Nation v. Azar IIDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. BecerraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.