Morris v. Metriyakool
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCynar, J.
Judge Bronson has written an exceptionally learned and comprehensive opinion. I agree with his conclusion that the arbitration agreement is not a contract of adhesion. With some hesitation, I also agree that the Medical Malpractice Arbitration Act is not unconstitutional or unconscionable since it does not deprive the patient of a meaningful opportunity to decide whether to relinquish his or her constitutional right to "court access”. While having serious reservations, I believe the act to be constitutional even though it requires that a physician serve as one of the three members of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Bd. of Dir. of La. Recovery Dist. v. All Taxpayers, Property Owners, and Citizens of StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Morris v. MetriyakoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Jackson v. Detroit Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cushman v. FrankelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Williams v. O'CONNORMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.