Legal Opinion
Novotny v. Renewal by Andersen Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 6, 2007No. 49A05-0602-CV-93PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Paula M. Novotny appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion to compel filed by Renewal by Andersen Corp., Renewal by Andersen, Inc. (collectively, “Andersen”) 1 and Bee Window, Inc. 2
We affirm.
ISSUE
Whether the trial court erred in granting the motion by Andersen and AGF to compel arbitration of Novotny’s claims against Andersen and AGF.
FACTS
On March 13, 2004, Novotny ordered three sets of sliding glass doors from Andersen. On the same day, Novotny and Andersen entered into a Sales Agreement. The Sales Agreement listed several terms and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MPACT Construction Group, LLC v. Superior Concrete Constructors, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Trimble v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Goebel v. Blocks & Marbles Brand Toys, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Bopp v. BramesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Precision Homes of Indiana, Inc. v. PickfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brumley v. Commonwealth Business ColLege Education Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Welty Building Company, LTD. and Ohio Farmers Insurance Company v. Indy Fedreau Company, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- David Earley and Rhonda Earley v. Edward Jones & Co., LP, Edward Jackson, and Adam JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- American Arbitration Ass'n v. North Miami Community SchoolsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Brumley v. Commonwealth Business ColLege Education Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.