Legal Opinion
Town of East Hampton v. Department of Public Health
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 25, 2003No. AC 23275PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The plaintiff, the town of East Hampton (town), appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the granting of the motion filed by the defendant, the department of public health (department), to dismiss the plaintiffs administrative appeal on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA).1 On appeal, the town claims that (1) the court improperly concluded that General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 25-36 (a) did not confer a right to a direct appeal from the department’s orders issued…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Summit Hydropower Partnership v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ferguson Mechanical Co. v. Department of Public WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Labow v. LabowConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Town of East Hampton v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Plante v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004