Broadfoot v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, defendant in the lower court, was indicted charged with the offense of violating the State prohibition laws, by having prohibited liquors in his possession unlawfully. There were three counts in the indictment, but count three thereof was eliminated by the court, after the evidence was closed, for the reason there was no evidence adduced upon the trial to sustain the charge contained in said count.
Counts one and two of the indictment were in proper form and substance, and were drawn in strict conformity to the provisions of section 4644 of the Code of 1923.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Hill Grocery Co. v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
- Holcombe v. Mobile CountyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Sandoval v. HaganDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- Hunt v. TuckerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
- Alabama Department of Revenue v. National Peanut Festival Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- First United Security Bank v. McCollumCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.