Steele v. Steele

HILL, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant, Richard S. Steele (Father), contends that the district court erred in ordering Appellee, Lee Anne Steele (Mother),1 to pay only the statutory minimum support of $50.00 per month. Father also contends that the district court improperly applied the statutory factors it is required to consider in deviating from the presumptive child support obligation, and that it acted arbitrarily and capriciously in applying “other factors” contemplated by the governing statute. We will affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Father posits these issues for our consideration:

I. The district…