Legal Opinion

Egan v. Egan

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2010No. S-10-0065PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] The district court allowed a significant deviation from Kori Kae Egan's (Mother) child support obligation. Joseph Alan Egan (Father) claims that the district court abused its discretion by considering improper factors in allowing the deviation and erred in calculating Mother's net income. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it ordered a deviation from the presumptive child support amount and, although it erred by deducting certain expenses in calculating Mother's net income, the error was harmless.

[¶2] We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶3] Father…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dowdy v. DowdyWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Slb v. JeoWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Dorr v. Smith, Keller & AssociatesWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In the Interest of SjjWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc. v. Wyoming Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cameron Kdell Bagley v. Angela S. BagleyWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Lemus v. MartinezWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Windham v. WindhamWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. J & T Properties, LLC v. GallagherWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Benjamin Greer Marquis v. Laura Ann Marquis n/k/a Laura Ann FausettWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API