Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kelly

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 22, 1980PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1(a). The defendant, a black man convicted of kidnap and rape of a white woman, claims error in the refusal of the trial judge to dismiss the jury venire because only five of the fifty prospective jurors were black. In the absence of any evidence that the ratio of blacks to the venire as a whole was disproportionately smaller than the ratio of blacks to the population as a whole in Suffolk County and that the alleged underrepresentation was due to systematic exclusion, the challenge is without merit. Commonwealth v. Williams, 378 Mass. 217, 221-222 (1979). Commonwealth v. Scanlan, 9 Mass.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCray v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. DiMatteoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. O'MALLEYMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API