Legal Opinion

State v. Ruzicka

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1984No. 84-325PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Defendant, Donald E. Ruzicka, appeals from his conviction, following a nonjury trial, of pandering, and from the sentence of 18 months’ probation with confinement in the county jail for the first 60 days and final 30 days of the probationary period. He urges that the pandering statute is unconstitutional, that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence, that the evidence is not sufficient to support his conviction, and that his plea in abatement should have been sustained. We find no error and affirm.

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-802 (Reissue 1979) provides that one commits pandering if,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. State v. LambNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. HuntNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Nebraska Coalition for Educational Equity & Adequacy v. HeinemanNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. MichalskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. RustNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API