Legal Opinion

Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Associated Press

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1920PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 27, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 27, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The provision of the Interstate Commerce Act requiring equality of service does not apply as between different localities where the circumstances and conditions are substantially different. (Boston C. of C. v. L. S. & M. S. Ry. Co., 1 I. C. C. R. 436; W. B. Assn. v. A., T.…

1Opinion of the CourtCardozo, J.

In August, 1912, the Postal Telegraph-Cable Company made a contract to furnish to the Associated Press the use of two private wires between Omaha, Nebraska, and San Francisco, California, for five years from November 1,1912, one wire to be used day and night, except between the hours of 5 a. m. and 8 a. m., and the other to be used at night from 6 p. m. to 11 p. m., at the yearly rate for each wire of $24 per mile for service by day, and $12 per mile far service by night. On December 29, 1912, there was a like contract for two private wires between Chicago and Omaha. On January 1, 1915, there…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Empire Health & Accident Insurance v. PurcellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API