Legal Opinion

Covert v. Hastings Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided March 4, 2005No. 3, 4, 5PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELEHANT, District Judge.

In each of the foregoing cases, the issue herein considered is identically involved. Therefore, a duplicate original of the memorandum will be placed by the clerk among the files of each of the actions, in which identical orders have heretofore been made by the court. And for the sake of convenience and brevity, the court’s further discussion will proceed in language implying the pendency .of a single case with one plaintiff and one defendant, though the court remains mindful that it is responsive to one issue in the cases between separate plaintiffs and a single…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Jones v. PeblerIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Flynn v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Rose v. GisiNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State ex rel. Marrow v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frederick N. Peterson, Administrator of the Estate of Charles Steven Peterson, Deceased v. U-Haul Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  2. Halverson v. Sonotone Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Edwards v. GisiDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
  4. Jones v. WoodDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
  5. Thomas v. WarrenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API