United States v. Coupé
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
This was a petition for the remission of the forfeiture of an automobile which had been seized by the government upon the ground that it had been used in the removal, deposit and concealment of illegally manufactured liquor. The petitioner is a finance company holding a bailment lease of the car in question.
There is no question that the car was used by the bailee in violation of the revenue laws.
Under 27 U.S.C. Sec. 40a, 27 U.S.C.A. § 40a, the claimant may not have the forfeiture remitted unless he proves three things: First, that he has an interest acquired in…
2Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Ford Truck, Motor & Serial No. BB18-3749639Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- United States v. Federal Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. McArthurCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. One Studebaker Coach, Engine No. 147841District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
- United States v. One 1941 Buick Sport Coupe AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.