Legal Opinion

Letterman v. English Mica Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1959No. 307PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

Plaintiffs contend that they alleged sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action for a continuing trespass on the part of English Mica Company on their land and roadways.

“At common law, every man’s land was deemed to be in-closed, so that every unwarrantable entry on such land necessarily carried with it some damage for which the trespasser was liable. Any entry on land in the peaceable possession of 'another is deemed a trespass, without regard to the amount of force used, and neither the form of the instrumentality by which the close is broken nor the extent of the damages is material.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Moses v. Town of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. McDaniel v. Greenville-Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. Cline v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Key Sales Co. v. SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANYDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
  2. Keziah v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. City of Kings Mountain v. GoforthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Gillispie v. Goodyear Service StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Best v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API