Keziah v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
The first and principal question for decision is whether the charter granted to Wilmington and Charlotte Railroad Company by the 1854-1855 Session of the General Assembly by Chapter 225 granted a right of way 100 feet wide on each side of defendant’s main track, measuring from the center of same.
It is of interest to note that in the case of R. R. v. McCaskill, 94 N.C. 746, one of defendant’s corporate predecessors was plaintiff and the act before us in the instant case was therein construed. In that case the railroad brought an action in ejectment to recover possession of property located…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matthews v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Railroad v. OliveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Carolina Central Railroad v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Raleigh & Augusta Air Line Railroad v. SturgeonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Hendrix v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Taha v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Higgins v. PattonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- North v. PUBLIC SERV. CO., ETC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sentry Enterprises, Inc. v. Canal Wood Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Schwarz & Schwarz, LLC v. Caldwell County RailroadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.