BP Products North America, Inc. v. Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants BP Products North America, Inc. (“BP”), and United States Steel Corporation (“U.S. Steel”) appeal from a decision made by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“the Commission”) involving Appellee Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor and Appel-lee/Cross-Appellant Northern Indiana Public Service Company (“NIPSCO”). We reverse and remand in part and affirm in part.
ISSUES
The following restated issues are dispos-itive:
I. Whether the Commission erred in determining that BP was acting as a “public utility” as that term is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hockett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Cawker v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Foltz, Van Camp Hdw., Etc. v. City of Indpls.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Portland Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. State ex rel. KeenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- BP Products North America, Inc. v. Indiana Office of Utility Consumer CounselorIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- NIPSCO Industrial Group v. Northern Indiana Public Service Company and Office of the Utility Consumer CounselorIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018