Legal Opinion

BP Products North America, Inc. v. Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 2011No. 93A02-0905-EX-490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Senior Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants BP Products North America, Inc. (“BP”), and United States Steel Corporation (“U.S. Steel”) appeal from a decision made by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“the Commission”) involving Appellee Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor and Appel-lee/Cross-Appellant Northern Indiana Public Service Company (“NIPSCO”). We reverse and remand in part and affirm in part.

ISSUES

The following restated issues are dispos-itive:

I. Whether the Commission erred in determining that BP was acting as a “public utility” as that term is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hockett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Cawker v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Foltz, Van Camp Hdw., Etc. v. City of Indpls.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Portland Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. State ex rel. KeenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. BP Products North America, Inc. v. Indiana Office of Utility Consumer CounselorIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. NIPSCO Industrial Group v. Northern Indiana Public Service Company and Office of the Utility Consumer CounselorIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API