Eastman Kodak Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
This case involves the question of the credit to which a taxpayer is entitled for foreign taxes paid by its foreign subsidiary.
Until 1931 a taxpayer had been permitted to take credit for foreign taxes paid computed according to the formula insisted upon by plaintiff, but in that year the Commissioner changed the formula to that applied in this case. The same question was presented in American Chicle Company v. United States, 94 Ct.Cl. 699; 316 U.S. 450, 62 S.Ct. 1144, 86 L.Ed. 1591, except that the years involved in that case were after the change in practice, and the years…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Helvering v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Helvering v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pacific First Fed. Sav. Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
- Vogel Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- In re Pittsburgh Railways Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Pacific First Fed. Sav. Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993