Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Electric Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 5, 1954No. 50253PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitakeR, Judge

Plaintiff is a public utility company. In the computation of its surtax net income it seeks to deduct dividends paid by it on some of its stock, which it alleges is preferred stock as defined in section 26 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed the deduction and plaintiff, having paid the tax computed without it, sues to recover it.

The question presented is whether or not the stock is in fact preferred stock as defined in that section.

Section 15 (as added by sec. 201 of the Revenue Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 516, and amended by sec. 105 (b) of the Revenue Act…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helvering v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. International Railway Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Helvering v. Credit Alliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Campbell Fed. Prohibition Administrator v. Galeno Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gamman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  2. Estate of Lovett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  4. Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Gamman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API