Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Wooters

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1935No. 6191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C. J.

Respondent trundling a two-wheel pushcart, assertedly in the rain, south on the west side of the paved portion of Pocatello Avenue, a through or stop street, bordered by no sidewalk but a cinder footpath customarily used by pedestrians, in Pocatello, between 11 and 12 o’clock P. M., December 30, 1933, was struck from the rear by a taxicab, breaking his left leg below the knee, necessitating the amputation thereof, and cutting and bruising him, for which injuries he recovered a verdict against both Otis Wooters and Ora Ball for $16,000.

Respondent alleged Otis Wooters and Ora Ball were owners…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. CorcoranIdaho Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. SmailesIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Boeck v. BoeckIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Brixey v. CraigIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Emery v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunclick, Inc. v. Utah-Idaho Concrete Pipe Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Turner v. PurdumIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Jackman v. HamersleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Evans v. Bannock CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Ausich v. FrankIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API