Legal Opinion

Villarreal v. Elizondo

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 14, 1992No. 13-91-512-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

In a trial to a jury for deceptive trade practices, violations of the Vehicle Installment Sale Act (Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5069-7.01 et seq. (Vernon 1987)), and personal injuries, Walter Elizondo obtained a judgment against appellant for $20,796. By nine points of error, appellant complains that the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction and that no evidence or insufficient evidence supports liability. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Elizondo purchased a car from appellant in December of 1987. The parties negotiated in Spanish and agreed that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dyson v. Olin Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Allied Finance Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Weitzel v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Flynt v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gorges Foodservice, Inc. v. Huerta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  2. Bransom v. Standard Hardware, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. McLendon v. McLendon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  5. Crumpton v. Mike Stevens, MGACourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API