Legal Opinion

Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. LeMay

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 12, 1982No. C-3-80-362PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS; PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS SUSTAINED AS A MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH RESPECT TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF LeMAY, SULLIVAN, MIXON AND GALLAHER, AND TO THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF OF AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM BY PHOENIX GLOVE COMPANY; PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO BIFURCATE BY SEVERING DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIMS FOR SEPARATE TRIAL SUSTAINED; DEFENDANT PHOENIX GLOVE COMPANY’S MOTION TO SEVER PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS FOR SEPARATE AND SECONDARY TRIAL OVERRULED

RICE, District Judge.

This matter is before this Court upon three motions, to wit:(1) Plaintiffs’ motion for a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co. Dempsey Pump Co. v. Kobe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ismail v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. Scooter Store, Inc. v. SpinLife. Com, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  3. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1993
  4. Microsoft Corp. v. Action SoftwareDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
  5. Calmar, Inc. v. Emson Research, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API