Legal Opinion

Nesloney v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 1983No. A14-82-708-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELLIS, Justice.

Appellant was convicted under Tex.Parks & Wildlife Code § 47.037 (Vernon 1976) for refusing to allow an employee of the Department of Texas Parks and Wildlife to inspect aquatic products in his possession. A fine of $75.00 was assessed. We reverse.

In his third ground of error, appellant asserts the trial court erred in overruling his motion to quash the complaint because § 47.037 on its face violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution by allowing a criminal prosecution to result from a person’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nesloney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Baggett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1984
  3. Baggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Baggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API