Legal Opinion

Nesloney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1986No. 605-83PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

W.C. DAVIS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of refusing to allow an employee of the Department of Parks and Wildlife to inspect aquatic products in his possession as per V.T.C.A., Parks and Wildlife Code, § 47.037. The court assessed punishment at a fine of $75.

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston held the statute unconstitutional on its face as a violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Art. 1, § 9 of the Texas Constitution. Nesloney v. State, 653 S.W.2d 582 (Tex.App.—Houston [14 Dist.]…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Nesloney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Santikos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Baggett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Santikos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Weatherford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1991
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API