Legal Opinion

Buehler Bros. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

It is in substance alleged in the complaint that on July 5, 1934, after hearing had pursuant to secs. 102.03 to 102.35, Stats., the Industrial Commission made certain findings upon which it entered an order and award requiring the plaintiffs to pay to the defendant, Ross Deaton, certain sums of money as compensation; that the plaintiffs are aggrieved because the said award was procured by fraud, in that the entire claim of the applicant upon which said award was based was false and fraudulent, not only in its inception, but throughout the entire proceedings, for the reason that the said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Laun v. KippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Boring v. OttWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Pellett v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Uecker v. ThiedtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Klug & Smith Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Ladish Malting Co. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  4. Borello v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ritholz v. AmmonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API