Legal Opinion
Williams v. Williams
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 29, 1932No. 4576PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The first question which presents itself is the one raised by the contention of the ap-pellee Anna that the District Court lacked jurisdiction over an indispensable party, and therefore could not proceed to judgment as against her. She contends that Leland is an indispensable party.
Anna was a resident of Illinois, and was personally served with summons. Leland was a resident of Indiana, and substituted service was had upon him pursuant to section 57 of the Judicial Code (section 118, title 28, USCA).
The case at bar is a suit by one of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Eidman v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Moore v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- New Orleans v. WarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Seymour v. FreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1953
- Seven Oaks, Inc. v. Federal Housing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Plimpton v. Mattakeunk Cabin Colony, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1934
- McNulty v. HeineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- Davidson v. GradyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.