Legal Opinion
Plimpton v. Mattakeunk Cabin Colony, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 17, 1934No. 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
This matter is now before the court on the motion of the executors to quash the writ of scire facias issued pursuant to Revised Statutes, § 955, as amended (28 USCA § 778).
Receivers in equity were appointed by this court in February, 1928, upon the filing *73of a creditor’s bill and consent of the defendant Cabin Colony. The receivership was made permanent. The Colony’s principal asset was real estate situated in Connecticut. On April 9, 1930, Robert E. Farley, the executors’ testator, the original respondent in the proceeding to which the present motion is addressed,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Saverio D. Iovino and Leonard P. Luisi v. George Waterson, Jr., Frances E. Carlin, as Administratrix of George Waterson, Sr., Deceased, SubstitutedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Commercial Solvents Corporation v. JassponDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Plimpton v. Mattakeunk Cabin Colony, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1934
- Bertsch v. CanterburyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Electropure Sales Corp. v. AnglimDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.