Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Bowman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1985No. G001539PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.

Celia Bowman appeals the court’s order dismissing her complaint and entering judgment for Mary Bowman pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c. We are asked to decide whether the court erred in applying the terminable interest rule to defeat Celia’s community interest in her deceased former husband’s employment pension plan benefits. We also consider whether In re Marriage of Lorenz (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 464 [194 Cal.Rptr. 237] precludes her from collecting any of the term life insurance proceeds. We hold the terminable interest rule is inapplicable to a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. In Re Marriage of AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. In Re Marriage of ElfmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re Marriage of SpenglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Thorne v. RaccinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API